atmospheres and attitudes
Jan. 16th, 2010 05:54 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I've been to one previous S.J. Tucker show, and attended (part of) this afternoon's program. Much as I hate negativity, this is preying on my mind and I think it requires a public comment.
Previous impression: S.J. Tucker (
s00j) does pagan folk/filk-ish stuff, with a couple of songs that appeal to me and a whole lot more that's pleasant, sometimes precious, mostly just not really my sort of thing. But I know a few people who love her, so I've kept listening.
Today: well, she started with a few songs that fit the various categories above...and then she introduced a song about a "single mother" who is urban-tough, trying to take care of her babies, etc. --oh, and teaching them to steal the cat-food left out on
s00j's band-mate's doorstep. OK, I'd figured out this was a raccoon shortly before she said something like "and she's the leader of the local ring-tailed gang." And that was the beginning of serious discomfort.
And then she went into a parody of "Summertime and the living is easy"--in a Southern-influenced-Black accent. And then a song in the voice of "Miss Tough-Titty Cupcakes," as she and band-mates have apparently christened the raccoon...same accent, plus every stereotype in the book about urban Black women and single mothers.
*sigh*
My companion and I left after that song. I saw
s00j in the hallway after the show, and asked her please to think about what she was doing with that song, and said that I found it offensive. Her eyes welled up, and she said that she was sorry that I'd found it offensive; as I left, it seemed to me that her friends gathered around to comfort her.
I don't mean this to be a personal attack on the singer, who is probably a well-meaning lady who envisioned an amusing anthropomorphism and perhaps a provocative subversion of some sort, and who may even be young enough to be unaware that--quite aside from the numerous stereotypes embodied in the song--"coon" is all by itself a highly-charged term, adding an absolutely unmistakable and inescapable flavor of racism to the piece.
But it is a challenge, to all of you, to all of us. We've had a lot of conversations recently, at cons and in LJ and elsewhere, about diversity and such. Numerous fans of color have talked about feeling unwelcome at cons, about the pervasiveness and sometimes encouragement of the same racist attitudes they find outside fandom. I can only imagine how alienated and isolated someone might feel, listening to that song and its enthusiastic reception (by an all-white audience, so far as I could see). And therefore I'm asking people to think about their attitudes and what these do to our community.
Previous impression: S.J. Tucker (
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Today: well, she started with a few songs that fit the various categories above...and then she introduced a song about a "single mother" who is urban-tough, trying to take care of her babies, etc. --oh, and teaching them to steal the cat-food left out on
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
And then she went into a parody of "Summertime and the living is easy"--in a Southern-influenced-Black accent. And then a song in the voice of "Miss Tough-Titty Cupcakes," as she and band-mates have apparently christened the raccoon...same accent, plus every stereotype in the book about urban Black women and single mothers.
*sigh*
My companion and I left after that song. I saw
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I don't mean this to be a personal attack on the singer, who is probably a well-meaning lady who envisioned an amusing anthropomorphism and perhaps a provocative subversion of some sort, and who may even be young enough to be unaware that--quite aside from the numerous stereotypes embodied in the song--"coon" is all by itself a highly-charged term, adding an absolutely unmistakable and inescapable flavor of racism to the piece.
But it is a challenge, to all of you, to all of us. We've had a lot of conversations recently, at cons and in LJ and elsewhere, about diversity and such. Numerous fans of color have talked about feeling unwelcome at cons, about the pervasiveness and sometimes encouragement of the same racist attitudes they find outside fandom. I can only imagine how alienated and isolated someone might feel, listening to that song and its enthusiastic reception (by an all-white audience, so far as I could see). And therefore I'm asking people to think about their attitudes and what these do to our community.
(frozen) From S. J.
Date: 2010-01-17 01:04 am (UTC)I regret that I was too shocked to ask you what had offended you about the song in question when we were face to face. That makes this post all the more valuable to me.
Today was the first time (and the second as well) that anyone, at any event, fandom-friendly or otherwise, was brave enough to tell me that s/he found "Tough Titty Cupcakes" to be offensive. I am grateful to you for that, for many reasons. I hope that all of my friends and loved ones, regardless of the color of their skin, will always be so honest with me. (That statement is not an invitation for anyone and everyone to say hurtful things in my direction in comments, by the way. Please, please don't, for all of our sakes. If you must do--and I ask you to think about whether you truly must, please do me the same honor that this poster has done: do so one-on-one.)
One of the first people to ever tell me how much she loved this particular song (which was written by, and the character of which contrived by, my cellist Betsy Tinney, whom you also saw on stage today) is a lady named Annie who lives in New Orleans. I hope that you get a chance to meet her some day. My audience, as a whole, is far from all-white. Today was no exception.
It has never been and it will never be my *intent* as a performer to make anyone in my audience uncomfortable with any given song, or to make them get up and walk out.
Thank you again. You have my respect and my gratitude, always.
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 01:43 am (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 06:04 am (UTC)(To reply to another comment, which I can't figure out how to unscreen: I should have made clear that you absolutely did not use the word "coon" itself; the issue here was that using what I perceive as a Black stereotype in the context of a song about a raccoon seemed to imply and echo the racial slur.)
I am now sorry that I didn't stay to hear more of your show. I liked the Firebird song very much, and loved "Ravens in the Library."
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 09:49 am (UTC)You might have corrected your post to remove the incorrect statements and inferences of fact which you've retracted in comments but left for the public eye, but you did not do so, just as you did not bother to identify the specific stereotypes which horrified you enough to take this to public comment.
I know from hearing many, many other performances of TTC that it is performed a la Billie Holiday, who was a Black woman, but not a Southerner.
For the record, your use of the phrase "Southern-influenced-Black accent" is itself offensive, as the phrase "Black accent" is rooted in some fairly problematic assumptions, being mostly used by white people to categorize certain speech patterns and dialect as part of a (nonexistent) Black monolith-culture. Let me add that the song is not written in African American Vernacular English, the dialect most frequently assigned the incorrect label "Black accent". Not even close. There's more to that dialect than the word "ain't".
From hearing many renditions of TTC, I feel confident stating that the phrase "leader of a ring-tailed gang" appears nowhere in the song; none of the unique words in that phrase even appear. (Video of the
However, the second line is "Mama's got a little something to tell you about how it's gonna be to live life as a raccoon." (emphasis mine.) The listener isn't even required to determine the identity of the speaker by inference. It's made explicit. (According to your post, you "figured out" what was stated in plain language, but a phrase that didn't appear was the "beginning of serious discomfort".)
As for "every stereotype in the book about urban Black women and single mothers"... for all the "numerous" stereotypes you claim, you have failed to identify a single one specifically in your post, despite this "preying on your mind" until you were driven to make public comment. If you had done so, perhaps there could have been a discussion of how TTC might or might not play into them.
As for noting that it was an "all-white audience, so far as I could see" - your statement contains some fairly large assumptions about the visibility of racial identity. It's almost pure irony, when juxtaposed with your earnest call for people to reconsider their attitudes.
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 01:39 pm (UTC)Also, as someone who was there: There was extended patter at the beginning of the song about the raccoon that the song is very specifically about. It's not even that Tricky Pixie set out to anthropomorphize a raccoon to reflect a single-mother experience - as S00j very clearly stated before the song, this is a song written about a specific raccoon that was stealing trash and cat food from
Since there was an extended patter and explanation before the song that made that abundantly clear - original poster, I have no idea how you arrived at these crazy conclusions. No "figuring out" was needed. She told you up front. And I agree with the commenter above that your response says more about you than about what you're reacting to.
In addition, members of a minority group tend not to like it when members of a majority group swoop in to "protect" them from things they don't need or want protection from. I suggest you take that energy and do some research about how to be an ally.
As for noting that it was an "all-white audience, so far as I could see" - your statement contains some fairly large assumptions about the visibility of racial identity.
Indeed. The audience was predominantly white, because Arisia is - but from my vantage point I saw many black, Asian, and Indian attendees, and they were all rocking out.
I'll add that yes, that's a basic Southern accent, and one S00j comes by honestly (and one that comes out of me when I'm tired or pissed off, which means if I'd been with S00j when you decided to fling nasty on her last night, you'd've heard it).
I was a Southern single mom for the first six years of my daughter's life, and I scan the song as *celebrating* kick-ass single moms who keep their babies fed. I'm pretty sure raccoons don't have race, so that really didn't enter into it for me. Or, apparently, anyone else.
If you could name a single stereotype in the song, maybe we could have an actual discussion on this. But I know you can't, because there aren't any.
The graceful thing to do would be to remove this nasty dig and apologize to the women you've been slandering.
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 06:41 pm (UTC)I was very confused when I heard there was a kerfluffle over this song because it's one of the ones that I recognize largely because of the hilarious name and the raccoon. I think people are projecting their own issues onto the song so I think they could find their own issues in the lyrics if they try hard enough.
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 02:38 pm (UTC)Until someone steps up who says they actually felt alienated and isolated, rather than just having to imagine it, I would suggest continuing to calibrate your racism-detector; false positives are, on balance, probably not as bad as false negatives, but they do a different kind of harm--causing "boy who cried wolf" cynicism in the community as well as distressing people who have done nothing wrong--and I hope the primary goal of your increased awareness is to minimize harm. If there's a future situation that bothers you, I can personally recommend asking reality check questions like "Does anyone else see a problem with this?" of several friends in private before making a big post full of strong statements in a public place.
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 02:44 pm (UTC)I saw nothing nasty in your words, nor any slander. You made no demands for apologies or that she stop singing it. You talked to the person directly, which always ought to be the first, honest step, and she appreciated it. But a public post offers the chance of support and consolation for others who might also have felt that way and been afraid to express it, and I think that's fair.
I suspect some of the disbelief being shown at your objections is a matter of age more than background. I grew up in the South. I remember the first SF con I went to, when I first came to Boston in the very early 70s, and being stymied at trying to describe one person to another. The person I was trying to describe was black. But my family and neighbors didn't use the term "black" (much less "African-American"). They still used the words "Negroes" and "colored people" and I knew that was wrong, but I wasn't yet sure of what wasn't. I wasn't there for the song. But if I had been, yes, I would have been a little uncomfortable. And yes, as someone else says, that might say more about me than about the song. But people should be allowed to express how things affect them without being jumped on, as long as they do so politely, and I think you did.
In a way, though, I'm very, very glad that others are so astonished at your interpretation. It's a proof of how far we've come.
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 02:57 pm (UTC)I do think the OP handled this very poorly. She cornered the musician and berated her - that in itself would have been bad enough (an e-mail when she was feeling less hostile would have been better). But then she decided to bring this to the Arisia LJ community, and do so in a nasty way, and that seems inappropriate to me. Her own LJ is the place for this. Slandering the guest of honor on the con community is bad form.
And yes, it's slander when she's claiming things that aren't so. There's not a sentence in this that's remotely accurate, aside from her own feelings about the song, and I'd take this post better if it wasn't 80% fiction. (Yes, I was at the concert.)
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 12:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 01:16 am (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 01:36 am (UTC)Thanks again,
Lisa/
no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 07:08 pm (UTC)I know a lot of us white fen are still trying to figure out how to handle things in a post-Racefail universe. So please stop and think before you post much longer than you would otherwise, because we don't have a good grip on what we're doing just yet. It can be hard to pick between staying silent and letting bad things perpetuate or speaking up and making things worse; when in doubt, I'd go for letting PoC speak for themselves rather than trying to put words in their mouths.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 10:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 10:17 pm (UTC)TOO LATE!
And yes, it is insanely aggravating and exhausting to be expected to be an unpaid resource to answer all questions about race and racism.
I would also point out that I created a hand out of resources about race and racism (available at http://www.scribd.com/sparkysays). I handed it out at 2 panels, and copies were left in the literature stand.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 07:29 pm (UTC)It would be completely inappropriate to grab someone in the hallway because they have the skin color desired and make them listen to the song, then give an opinion. Checking in with someone you know personally is entirely different.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 04:20 am (UTC)I think everything in your comment except this phrase is awesome.
I think this phrase
-- implies that white people are done being full of race-related fail, which seems very unlikely, since Racefail '09 was a teeny tiny thing in the grand picture of this very very racist world, and even in our little community there are plenty of people who ignored it or got nothing out of it or found it more personally distressing than useful (which is why we need posts like this).
-- implies that Racefail '09 (which I think continues to need and deserve a date) was most notable for the way it helped us white people to improve ourselves, which is rather appropriative.
-- suggests that that experience of self-improvement and enlightenment is universal, which is both too kind to some white folks and too unkind to POC who didn't need the education in the fucked-up-ness of racism and don't have the privilege of deciding that they now live in a world where all that is over and done with.
I figure that's probably not what you meant to do, and it sounds like you're the sort of person who'd appreciate the food for thought, so I respectfully submit a recommendation for finding a different phrase to describe what you mean there.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 05:28 am (UTC)Good memes are hard. I need to think more about this. Thank you for pointing it out.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 05:46 am (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 11:24 pm (UTC)-
no subject
Date: 2010-01-18 11:44 pm (UTC)So, the only person who can turn off comments completely is the OP. The only thing I can do as a moderator is delete the post. I do NOT want to delete the post as there's been some good discussion in the comments and that seems (to me) to be overreacting to delete it all.
Thank you,
Lisa
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 08:15 pm (UTC)The question has been raised about why community moderators have been freezing replies to comments on threads in this post. We walked a fine line between a dislike of silencing people and our desire to discourage a full-blown debate in this forum.
Many of the follow on comments attempted to defend Sooj by attacking or contradicting the OP. Such comments do an injustice to Sooj's embrace of all of her audience, and are counterproductive in this context.
As this year's Guest Of Honor Liaison, I would have liked to see the posting end with
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 10:08 pm (UTC)In the words of my very own Southern grandmother, "Well, I declare."
The OP had a one on one conversation that didn't suit her with the only other person y'all believe should have been involved - and then she made the choice to take it to the public community, with much more-in-sorrow-than-in-anger about how this required public comment. At least while she thought people were going to agree with her, she seemed happy for a discussion to take place. It's only once a discussion started actually happening that comments started getting frozen to "keep down arguing" that hadn't actually happened yet, unless you define "disagreement" and "critique" as "arguing". I'm also not seeing these "attacks" against the OP. Criticism is not always an attack. Public comment sometimes creates public criticism, and most adults are aware of this...particularly when they, you know, enable comments.
I'm also confused by your characterization of her post as an "inquiry". Inquiries usually contain questions. Hers contained accusations, assumptions, outright misstatements of fact and a well meaning call to reconsider attitudes, but it wasn't any kind of inquiry.
I'm not the only person who interpreted the original thread-freezing as an attempt to silence the discussion, as a quick look at the much longer, much less polite discussion (http://karnythia.livejournal.com/1464934.html) over at
The previous handling of this did not impress me, but I cut y'all some slack at the time because the convention was ongoing, which eats energy and available dealing-with-internet time. I must confess I'm even less impressed now by what this latest update indicates about where priorities lie and precisely how much value is placed on maintaining the appearance of harmony in this space rather than encouraging honest communication on difficult subjects.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 10:16 pm (UTC)Someone else local can moderate. Dealing with staff drama/arguments/behavior/etc is plenty enough for me. I call quits.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 10:49 pm (UTC)I don't have any answer that I could give you that would explain what went through the minds of the people who asked me to screen comments so I won't try.
One of them may step up. Or not. Someone else with more time to deal with LJ stuff can jump in and deal with LJ stuff.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-20 12:50 pm (UTC)As you mentioned that you cut us some slack for actions during the convention, I do want to point out that by late Monday, when the convention was over, there were active threads going on here, and we were not cutting that off.
I realize that one of the errors on my part was to see this LJ community as a place in which expression could be controlled to be an official message from Arisia. Despite the Arisia name on this community, it doesn't and can't reflect the point of view of the convention committee.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-20 04:15 pm (UTC)I felt like we couldn't/shouldn't talk here because of that, but didn't see anything in the rules that explained why...and by the time discussion started here again, the exhaustive discussion in karn's LJ was already at nearly 200 comments.
I get your point about community-as-official-statement vs. community-as-discussion-space. That's a hard line. And I appreciate you taking time to discuss it with me.