The layoffs and outsourcing, while handled in a manner that gives little consideration to veteran employees...
From the article referenced by the OP: The dismissed workers received two weeks of pay when they were let go, plus one week of pay for every year they worked at the Hyatt up to five or 10 years, depending on the hotel.
Since the entire group (minus one or two people) were laid off, I'd say there was plenty of consideration to veteran employees.
However, deceiving the outgoing staff so that they'll train their replacements as a way of saving a few bucks on a training program is utterly indefensible.
That does sound quite less than optimal which is why I originally asked what ron_newman which part he found indefensible.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 02:09 am (UTC)From the article referenced by the OP: The dismissed workers received two weeks of pay when they were let go, plus one week of pay for every year they worked at the Hyatt up to five or 10 years, depending on the hotel.
Since the entire group (minus one or two people) were laid off, I'd say there was plenty of consideration to veteran employees.
However, deceiving the outgoing staff so that they'll train their replacements as a way of saving a few bucks on a training program is utterly indefensible.
That does sound quite less than optimal which is why I originally asked what