Um, how is this action (and which action? The laying off? The outsourcing? The training?) indefensible? While you may not accept their defense, "We'd prefer not to go out of business" seems pretty reasonable to me.
Now I'm sure that there might well be ways to save money at these hotels that don't involve laying off housekeeping people but given that I (and I'm willing to wager, you) don't know their entire finances, it seems unlikely I can pass judgement on this action. Or do you know differently?
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-09-17 05:56 pm (UTC)Um, how is this action (and which action? The laying off? The outsourcing? The training?) indefensible? While you may not accept their defense, "We'd prefer not to go out of business" seems pretty reasonable to me.
Now I'm sure that there might well be ways to save money at these hotels that don't involve laying off housekeeping people but given that I (and I'm willing to wager, you) don't know their entire finances, it seems unlikely I can pass judgement on this action. Or do you know differently?
Edited better phrase things.