ext_110927 ([identity profile] donnad.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] arisia2008-01-21 12:14 pm

Arisia needs an attitude adjustment.

I am sure this will offend many people, and if it does I apologize, but I feel it has to be said.

I am disgusted and appalled at the rudeness and sense of entitlement I encountered from many of this year's staff members. And I am not the only person who noticed this.


An example...
I got up early on Sunday and went down to the staff den, I was there about 15 minutes before it was supposed to open, but the lovely staff den ladies let me in anyway. I told them I needed food so I could take some meds, but I could see they weren't quite ready yet and asked what I could do to help them get stuff put out. They gave me a couple things to do (and a danish so I could take my meds) and I went off to help. At 8:02AM a person walked in, I was just plugging in the kettle to heat water, sie wanted tea so I told hir it would be a few minutes while the water heated that I had just plugged it in. Hir response was very snobbishly "What do you mean the water is not hot yet?" I looked at hir and said well, you weren't here 10 minutes ago to plug it in. You want it faster, then feel free to come in early and help. These ladies were up just as late as the rest of us, they are doing their best." and I walked away.
Sure sie hadn't had hir morning caffiene yet, but that was no excuse to jump all over me because the kettle isn't hot. Sie had a coffee maker in hir room, there was nothing preventing hir from using it. This is just one instance I personally encountered in the den, I witnessed many more acts of rudeness directed at the ladies running the den and other staff members in the den, during my visits there. (I was not den staff, I was just helping out while waiting for the food to be ready.)

In general many staff members were surly, rude, and just basically snappish, many came across with the "I'm staff, I'm better than you" or the I'm staff therefore I'm entitled to [...] ahead of you" attitude.

In my opinion, If you want to be involved in Arisia, and deal with hundreds of fans and random people all weekend and can't keep a pleasant attitude, no matter how stressed you get, or how tired or overworked you are, perhaps you shouldn't be doing that job. It's like any job that involves dealing with the customer, you have to keep it all to yourself so as to not take it out on the unsuspecting and not offend. I was personally offended by many of the attitudes I encountered during the weekend by staff members I did not know and who didn't know me. There are places to let it all out, you shouldn't be snapping and rude to the attendees or they will stop coming and we cant have an Arisia without them.

I have a whole essay/rant about Arisia and it's changing dynamic as of late, How I feel it's strayed from it's original mission to be all inclusive and such, how it's more of a fannish lifestyle and polyamory based con now instead of Science Fiction and Fantasy based as originally intended, and how it really needs to be able to encompass all things equally*, but I will likely not subject people to it.

Personally with the next Arisia being the 20th, I would love to see the theme be "Back to Basics" or "Back to our Roots." But since I am just a lowly staff member, costumer and artist (who BTW has worked at every Arisia in some capacity to the point of never having to purchase a membership to Arisia yet) and really do not want any other responsibility right now, who am I to say what should happen?


*Of the panels offered pre-con, 47 "fannish lifestyle" panels this year and only 12 art, 12 filk, and 8 costume panels is not treating all things equally.

[identity profile] juniperthewise.livejournal.com 2008-01-21 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)
It didn't seem to me that "lifestyle" panels dominated. I'm just curious as to why you see Art, Filk, and Costuming as core SF areas. Do they, to you, outweigh books, movies, TV? I think if you included all the categories that relate to SF in your comparison, you'd see that your thumb is firmly planted on the scales and that SF is well represented. Certainly Boskone covers books better, but that's because Boskone is Boskone and Arisia Arisia. We chose Arisia over Boskone this year in order to get the full panoply of fandom. Next year we may do Boskone instead because our focus may be more on books then. To me, that's the core category as far as SF is concerned, so when I want that I go somewhere other than Arisia. I think it would be pointless to have Arisia and Boskone one month apart if they were identical. They meet different needs.

[identity profile] liamstliam.livejournal.com 2008-01-21 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Hehehe.

You said "dominated."

Hehehe.

[identity profile] shadesong.livejournal.com 2008-01-21 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
It didn't seem to me that "lifestyle" panels dominated.

Exactly. "Fannish Lifestyle" is a catchall phrase. That was the category for everything from blogging to raising your family in fandom to, yes, alternative lifetyles.

Personally? I feel that the entire con is Fannish Lifestyle.

And that, if you have to categorize, stuff like filk and costuming would go just as well in a general "fannish lifestyle" track. Ballgowns are pretty, yes. What do they have to do with sf/f? Hell if I know.

I'm just curious as to why you see Art, Filk, and Costuming as core SF areas. Do they, to you, outweigh books, movies, TV?

*nods* I'd argue that books are the most core of the core SF areas. Followed by TV and movies. I'm trying to figure out why they seem so irrelevant to the original poster, and why she thinks filk and costuming outweigh them. If you count actual SF categories like books and other media, the schedule doesn't look so out of balance.